![transformice hack 2016 transformice hack 2016](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0iBuzdNmQk4/maxresdefault.jpg)
#TRANSFORMICE HACK 2016 HOW TO#
There is a thread stickied in the Announcements section on how to protect your account, which has tips on how to keep your account safe.
![transformice hack 2016 transformice hack 2016](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yN9qYg_r3vY/maxresdefault.jpg)
The only way your account can be compromised is if your password is weak, you use the same password on other sites, or you have a keylogger on your computer. – Uanfala ( talk) 23:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC) If I had to throw out a crazy guess, I would say that's why we have the current default.It is not possible for other users to "hack" into your account. TfM nominators should be encouraged to give at least a passing thought to how the TfM message interacts with the template when transcluded. Debresser ( talk) 22:12, 25 October 2016 (UTC) I don't know which option should be the default one, but I know that for different templates different ones would work best. Pp p e ry 22:08, 25 October 2016 (UTC) I am of the opinion that noinclude tags are a good solution. All of the problems that require it should be fixed some other way. Debresser ( talk) 16:34, 22 October 2016 (UTC) Debresser: when noinclude tags are needed. I think that when noinclude tags are needed, then they are needed regardless of the whether the size of the template is small or tiny. Pp p e ry 23:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC) Not necessarily. Debresser ( talk) 11:38, 20 October 2016 (UTC) I would agree with you, Debresser, except that doing so would strengthen the position of the editors who want them to be. I would propose to remove the tiny option from this template altogether. And since we are all expressing our opinions here, I think the tiny parameter should never be used, the small parameter is sufficient in all cases a more modest notification is warranted. The tiny version is insufficient for that purpose. The purpose of this template is to invite editors to express their opinion. BrightRoundCircle ( talk) 08:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC) I disagree. I think the |type=tiny parameter should be used by default the other notices are much too obtrusive. No further edits should be made to this section. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review.
#TRANSFORMICE HACK 2016 ARCHIVE#
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. These are long-established titles so moving might cause more confusion. I think the snow rejection of a similar proposal by the same editor at Template_talk:Cfd#Requested_move_8_August_2016 is relevant to this discussion at well, and a huge indication that this move proposal should likewise be rejected.
#TRANSFORMICE HACK 2016 CODE#
Why does a template being substituted argue against moving it? Pp pe ry ( talk) 14:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC) īecause only the code will remain after the substitution, not the name.עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:11, 25 February 2010 (UTC) Sidebar versionĬan a sidebar version similar to so renaming is pointless. Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Deletion discussions#Have all XfD be substituted and link to the actual page of discussion. Have all XfD be substituted and link to the actual page of discussion 11 Template-protected edit request on 8 August 2016.10 Inline version breaks some templates.7 Less obtrusive notifications by default.5 Template-protected edit request on 8 August 2016 (2).1 Have all XfD be substituted and link to the actual page of discussion.